Cases 1 - 10 of 11
COHEN v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD.
as 1:2024cv20137
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN COHEN
Defendant:
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD. doing business as ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
William Ehart, Jr. v. Lahaina Divers, Inc., et al
as 22-16149
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILLIAM MCMEIN EHART, Jr., Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Maureen Anne Ehart, Deceased
Defendant / Appellant:
LAHAINA DIVERS, INC. and CORY DAM
Defendant:
KAITLIN MILLER, JULIANNE CRICCHIO and LAHAINA DIVE & SURF LLC
O'Hara v. Cahill
as 1:2021cv11271
Plaintiff:
Maureen O'Hara
Defendant:
Mary E. Cahill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LARSON et al v. NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.
as 1:2021cv22111
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN LARSON, CARL ANDERSON, EDWARD LUCIANO and others
Defendant:
NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vitale et al v. NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.
as 1:2018cv25385
Plaintiff:
Paul Franco, Anthony Vitale, Isabella Merlino and others
Defendant:
NCL (Bahamas) LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
FISHER v. Oceania Cruises, Inc.
as 1:2018cv21859
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN FISHER
Defendant:
Oceania Cruises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darmetko et al v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.
as 1:2015cv24089
Plaintiff:
Maureen Darmetko and Joseph Darmetko
Defendant:
NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Maureen Macy et al v. Princess Cruise Lines Ltd et al
as 2:2013cv09047
Defendant:
Does, John and Jane Doe, Princess Cruise Lines Ltd and others
Plaintiff:
Maureen Macy, Maureen Macy and Sharon Schmitz
Worsdale et al v. NCL (Bahamas), LTD
as 1:2012cv22116
Plaintiff:
Philip Worsdale and Maureen Worsdale
Defendant:
NCL (Bahamas), Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lannen v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2010cv20044
Plaintiff:
Maureen Lannen
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
