Cases 1 - 7 of 7
R.D. v. The City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00940
Plaintiff:
R.D.
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Mississippi, Mississippi State Department of Health and Trilogy Engineering Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
R.D. v. The City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00679
Plaintiff:
R.D.
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Mississippi, Mississippi State Department of Health and Trilogy Engineering Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moree et al v. Chevron Pipeline Company et al
as 2:2022cv02829
Defendant:
Zylem, Inc. doing business as Goulds Water Technology also known as Goulds Pumps, S J Electro Systems, Chevron Pipeline Company and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Moree and Fran Moree
Intervenor:
Luba Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
C.A. v. The City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
C.A., A.A., A.B. and others
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Mississippi, Chokwe A. Lumumba, Jr., Tony Yarber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Damasauskas v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv10501
Plaintiff:
R.D. Damasauskas
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzales et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00829
Plaintiff:
Grace A. Gonzales, Betty G. Maerker, Sylvian S. Carver, II and others
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc., CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chambers v. Classic BMW of Plano et al
as 3:2007cv01342
Defendant:
Classic BMW of Plano, Moritz BMW of Arlington, Marion's Wrecker Service, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Reshunn D. Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
