Cases 1 - 10 of 133
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Rayvon Boatman v. Wellpath Recovery Solutions, et al
as 23-12925
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYVON BOATMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, ELIZABETH PORFERT, MELINDA MASTERS and others
Lamonte, Jr. v. Pierce et al
as 1:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Charlie Lamonte McKinney, Jr. and Al-Kareem-Khalil
Defendant:
Special Agent Matthew Pierce, G.D.C. Criminal Investigation Division, G.D.C. Office of Professional Standards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03051
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Chavez v. Dougthy et al
as 1:2023cv22166
Plaintiff:
Anthony Chavez
Defendant:
Chris Dougthy and Sarah Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
BARBER et al v. JUSTICE et al
as 4:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
LARRY BARBER, MATTHEW LEVI FAISON and ELBERT JOHNSON
Defendant:
ODELL JUSTICE, JANET YELLEN, SARAH L KULL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEBOSE v. PATTEN et al
as 1:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
KADEEM DEBOSE
Defendant:
DETECTIVE WILLIAM PATTEN, DEPUTY SARAH WILCHER and DEPUTY JEFF FRICKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THORNTON v. WALL
as 5:2022cv00336
Plaintiff:
GEORGETTE BENITA THORNTON
Defendant:
CHIEF JUDGE SARAH F WALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEBOSE v. PATTEN et al
as 1:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
KADEEM CORDELL DEBOSE
Defendant:
WILLIAM PATTEN, SARAH WILCHER, JEFF FRICKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sarah Ritchie v. USA
as 22-12117
Petitioner / Appellant:
SARAH RITCHIE
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
