Cases 11 - 20 of 1,526
HUMANITARIAN v. LEARY et al
as 7:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
HUMANITARIAN and Larry L. Thomas Jr
Defendant:
PETER D LEARY, STEPHEN LYNN, PETER KO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Waterman v. Department of Children and Families
as 9:2024cv80443
Plaintiff:
Brandon Waterman
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families, Sarah Grebinar, Noah Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Robert Ardis v. Darlene Dickey, et al
as 24-10470
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant:
DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER CRUTCHFIELD and others
Shewmaker v. Treger et al
as 1:2024cv20953
Plaintiff:
MacKenzie Shewmaker
Defendant:
Sarah Treger, Benjamin Treger and Sarah Turner Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
R.C., et al v. Wanabana LLC, et al
as 24-10666
Plaintiff:
R.C., SARAH CALLAHAN and RICKY CALLAHAN, JR.
Defendant:
WANABANA LLC and WANABANA USA LLC
Kittrell et al v. Allen et al
as 1:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
Grady Kittrell, Michael Grimes, Craig Thomas and others
Defendant:
Craig Allen, Melissa Tarkenton-Allen, Virginia Vohs and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
CRANE v. CLARK et al
as 5:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
AMY CRANE
Defendant:
SARAH CLARK, BRANDI CUNNINGHAM and ASHLEY SLAUGHTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
