Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability)
RC v. Independent School District No. 2 of Osage County, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2023cv00478
Defendant:
Independent School District No. 2 of Osage County, Oklahoma, Pawhuska Public Schools and Tori Madison
Plaintiff:
RC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hammond (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2023cv02608
Plaintiff:
Tory Hammond
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plentyhoops v. Rolff et al
as 1:2022cv02720
Plaintiff:
Tori J Plentyhoops and Tori Plentyhoops
Defendant:
Jonathan Rolff, Tim Norton, Tim (I) Norton and others
Montgomery v. Anderson, et al
as 22-1306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM MONTGOMERY
Defendant / Appellee:
TORI ANDERSON and SCOTT BAKER
Montgomery v. Anderson et al
as 1:2021cv03191
Plaintiff:
William Montgomery
Defendant:
Tori Anderson and Scott Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucero v. Riviers et al
as 2:2016cv01158
Plaintiff:
Petra Jolene Lucero
Defendant:
Christopher Riviers, Tori Sandoval, Board of County Commissoners of the County of Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Board of County Commissioners for the County of Curry et al
as 2:2016cv00597
Plaintiff:
Kelly Cook
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners for the County of Curry, Tori Sandoval, Joan Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Sandoval et al
as 2:2015cv00666
Plaintiff:
Jack Aundrea Robinson
Defendant:
Tori Sandoval, Curry County Adult Detention Center and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sinfuego v. Curry County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 2:2015cv00563
Plaintiff:
Amanda Sinfuego
Defendant:
Curry County Board of County Commissioners, Lance Pyle and Tori Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
