Cases 41 - 50 of 96
Alvarez-Bazalar v. QuikTrip Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv03619
Plaintiff:
Armando Alvarez-Bazalar
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harvey v. The Phusion Group, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02337
Defendant:
XYZ Corp. 1-5, Burlington Factory Direct Corporation, The Phusion Group, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Haygar Harvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Elrod v. Southeastern Paper Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00094
Plaintiff:
Brandon Elrod
Defendant:
James E. Valentine, XYZ Corp. Nos 1 Through 20, Southeastern Paper Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Hakizimana v. D.M. Bowman, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00948
Defendant:
ABC Corp., Kevin Weaver, John Doe 1-2 and others
Plaintiff:
Fidele Hakizimana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Green v. National American Insurance Company et al
as 1:2021cv00835
Defendant:
ABC Corp., John Doe 1-2, Mark Widsom and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Favors v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 1:2021cv00268
Defendant:
Jane Doe, ABC Corp., John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Favors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mileski v. Whole Foods Market Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00235
Defendant:
ABC Corp., John Doe 1-10, Jane Doe 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
David Mileski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
DeBrock v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05118
Plaintiff:
Teresa DeBrock
Defendant:
ABC Corp., John/Jane Doe 1, Georgia CVS Pharmacy, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ulrich v. Dilbeck et al
as 1:2020cv04209
Defendant:
ABC Corp., John Doe 1-10, Marcus C. Dilbeck and others
Plaintiff:
Tina Ulrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Richardson v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv03438
Defendant:
Danielle Massey, Jane Doe, ABC Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
