Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Hart v. Judd et al
as 8:2023cv02133
Plaintiff:
Randy Hart and Randy Allen Hart
Defendant:
Grady Judd, FNU Fain, FNU Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hart v. Auburndale Police Deparment et al
as 8:2023cv02024
Plaintiff:
Randy Hart
Defendant:
Auburndale Police Deparment, FNU Rudolph, FNU Avila and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Shed Woods
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Dr Ventuo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-11445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-10798
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, STEVE UPON and others
Mack v. Oritz et al
as 5:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Johnny Mack
Defendant:
FNU Oritz, FNU Bowers, U.D.C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-10630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Hoti v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
Xhem Hoti
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, FNU Brown and Dept Health Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-12369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOONS, Facilities Director, ROBERT TOOLE, Field Operations Director and others
Ingram v. Antionelli et al
as 5:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Terry Ingram
Defendant:
FNU Antionelli, FNU Phelps, FNU Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
