Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Schlobohm v. Hayden et al
as 5:2022cv03314
Plaintiff:
Matthew Charles Schlobohm
Defendant:
Calvin Hayden, (fnu) Reed, (fnu) Crabtree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erwin (ID 123078) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2022cv03170
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Erwin
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Libby Keogh, Darcie Holthous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erwin (ID 123078) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2021cv03213
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Erwin
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Libby Keogh, Darcie Holthaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strader (ID 66677) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2021cv03204
Plaintiff:
James C. Strader and Craig James Strader
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, Sam A. Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blake (ID 96323) v. Bos et al
as 5:2021cv03176
Plaintiff:
Shaidon Blake
Defendant:
Marsha Bos, J. Hoepner, (fnu) Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strader (ID 66677) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2019cv03218
Defendant:
(fnu) Echols, (fnu) Galloway, (fnu) Byers and others
Plaintiff:
James C. Strader
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Haberer et al
as 5:2018cv03246
Defendant:
Corizon Company, Connie R. Delperdang, Deane Donley and others
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinshaw v. Hampton et al
as 5:2018cv03225
Defendant:
Louis A. Podrebarac, Clay A. Kuhns, Kathleen Neff and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Douglas Hinshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Norwood et al
as 5:2018cv03136
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Defendant:
Joe Norwood, Kansas Department of Corrections, Douglas Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Norwood et al
as 5:2018cv03009
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Defendant:
Joe Norwood, Kansas Department of Corrections, Douglas Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
