Cases 1 - 10 of 49,534
Hough v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv03077
Plaintiff:
Malik Hough
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, (fnu) Carter, (fnu) Alatary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sedillo v. Summit Foods Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Gilbert J Sedillo, Jr.
Defendant:
Summit Foods Inc., Roseanne Otero, Brittany Mayer-Schuler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sosa v. Tafoya
as 1:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Johnny A. Sosa
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clements v. Rios et al
as 2:2024cv00486
Petitioner:
James Clements
Respondent:
Hector Rios and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sechrist v. Harding
as 5:2024cv00503
Petitioner:
Tye A Sechrist
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spring v. Wasatch County Sheriff et al
as 2:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derek Spring
Defendant:
Wasatch County Sheriff and Jered W Rigby
Interested Party:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Czajkowski (PS) v. Trinity Food Services
as 1:2024cv01402
Plaintiff:
Conrad J. Czajkowski
Defendant:
Trinity Food Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winters (PS) v. Allied Security Company
as 1:2024cv01405
Plaintiff:
Paul Russell Winters
Defendant:
Allied Security Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartles (PS) v. Burnett et al
as 1:2024cv01412
Plaintiff:
Dustin Bartles
Defendant:
Chris Burnett and City of Loveland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Himelstieb v. Brandenburg, et al
as 24-1207
Plaintiff:
TYLER HIMELSTIEB
Defendant:
BRANDENBURG, Mental Health Clinician and TERRY MARTINEZ, Prison Nurse
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
