Cases filed in Kansas
Cases 1 - 10 of 31,361
Pierce v. Cannon et al
as 5:2024cv04033
Plaintiff: Morehei Pierce
Defendant: (fnu) Cannon, Kris Kobach, (fnu) Gorman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CEK v. The United States of America
as 2:2024cv02180
Plaintiff: CEK
Defendant: The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Kull v. Habakus
as 2:2024cv02179
Plaintiff: Charles Edward Kull
Defendant: Dr. Scott Habakus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02178
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02177
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Sheppard (ID 6003638) v. Snyder
as 5:2024cv03059
Petitioner: Marlon Dwane Sheppard
Respondent: Paul Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oakes Auto, Inc. et al v. Mitsubishi Motors of North America et al
as 2:2024cv02175
Plaintiff: Oakes Auto, Inc. and DO KCK, LLC
Defendant: Mitsubishi Motors of North America and Phil Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Kansys Staffing Group, LLC v. QRails, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02176
Plaintiff: Kansys Staffing Group, LLC
Defendant: QRails, Inc. and XTM, Inc. d/b/a QRails, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02174
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Franzese v. USD 229 Blue Valley et al
as 2:2024cv02173
Plaintiff: Virginia Franzese
Defendant: USD 229 Blue Valley and Chris Legleiter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?