Cases 41 - 50 of 442,074
Thompson v. The United States Of America
as 4:2024cv01892
Petitioner:
Charles Wendell Thompson
Respondent:
The United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hughes v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01897
Petitioner:
Darren Tramell Hughes
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gutierrez v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv01902
Petitioner:
Leonardo Gutierrez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Thompson v. Laurie Sue Baldwin et al
as 4:2024cv01904
Plaintiff:
Sidney Maurice Thompson, IV
Defendant:
Laurie Sue Baldwin, Marlon Thomas, Nueces Country Jail Correctional Officer Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmon v. Clean Harbors Deer Park LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01899
Plaintiff:
Patsy E. Carmon
Defendant:
Clean Harbors Deer Park LLC, Daniel Tauriello, International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 988 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Guajardo v. Lincoln National Corporation
as 7:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Diana Guajardo
Defendant:
Lincoln National Corporation d/b/a Lincoln Financial Group
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Go Fan Yourself, LLC v. IllumiPure, Inc.
as 4:2024cv01894
Plaintiff:
Go Fan Yourself, LLC
Defendant:
IllumiPure, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Linfo IP, LLC v. The Gap, Inc.
as 4:2024cv01895
Plaintiff:
LINFO IP, LLC
Defendant:
The Gap Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Simmons v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
William Simmons
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Kline v. Target Corporation
as 4:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Sharoen Kline
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
