Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Hilderbrant v. The City of Rochester et al
as 6:2021cv06714
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hilderbrant
Defendant:
The City of Rochester, Andrew Delduca, Bing Reaves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynch v. The City of Rochester et al
as 6:2021cv06708
Plaintiff:
Emily Lynch
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Bing Reaves, Anthony Mazurkiewicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cumberbatch et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11942
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Delgado, Diane DeLuca, Jerzy Cybulski and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Correale et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11769
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cruz, Sonia Desarden, Nicholas Dimarinis and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
DiPaola et al v. Capitol Records LLC
as 1:2016cv07245
Plaintiff:
V. Robert DiPaola and Daniel Beck
Defendant:
Capitol Records LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Dipaola Jr. v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00659
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Robert Dipaola Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bucher v. Facility-Roc, Inc et al
as 6:2014mc06011
Plaintiff:
Paul W. Bucher
Defendant:
Facility-Roc, Inc, Marquee Restorations, Inc., Jerry Dipaola and others
Berkley Networks Corporation v. Inmarket Media, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv05145
Plaintiff:
Berkley Networks Corporation
Defendant:
Inmarket Media, LLC, Mark Dipaola and Todd Dpaola
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Tang v. DiPaola
as 1:2009cv01992
Plaintiff:
Toan Tang
Defendant:
James V. DiPaola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
