Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection v. Progrexion Marketing, et al
as 23-4032
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION
Defendant / Appellant:
PROGREXION MARKETING, INC., PGX HOLDINGS, INC., PROGREXION TELESERVICES, INC. and others
Graff, et al v. Aberdeen Enterprizes, II, et al
as 21-5031
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY DERRYBERRY, Sheriff of LeFlore County, ABERDEEN ENTERPRIZES, II, INC., ADAM WOODRUFF, Sheriff of Latimer County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRA LEE WILKINS, LINDA MEACHUM, DAVID SMITH and others
Defendant:
P.D. TAYLOR, Sheriff of Oklahoma County
Moore v. Heath
as 2:2021cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Moore
Defendant:
John C. Heath ATTORNEY AT LAW, PLLC doing business as Lexington Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. OLP.com Inc
as 2:2020cv00643
Defendant:
Olp.Com Inc
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Petitioner:
John C. Heath
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 5531
Johnson v. Heath, et al
as 20-4103
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL HEATH, an individual and DAWN HEATH, an individual
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HARRY S. JOHNSON, an individual
United States v. Heath
as 20-6142
Defendant / Appellant:
PHILIP JAMES HEATH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Johnson v. Heath, et al
as 20-4095
Defendant / Appellee:
DAWN HEATH, individuals, MICHAEL R. HEATH and MICHAEL HEATH
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARRY S. JOHNSON, an individual
United States v. Heath
as 20-6138
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE HEATH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
