Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Taylor III v. Frishberg et al
as 4:2012cv01491
Plaintiff:
Thomas L Taylor III
Defendant:
Daniel S Frishberg , Elisea T Frishberg , Albert F Kaleta and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
In re: Michael Morton
as 12-50111
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL R. MORTON
Plaintiff - Respondent:
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, DISTRICT 19
Defendant - Respondent:
CITY OF BOERNE, PATRICK R. HEATH, Mayor, R.L. BIEN, all in their official capacities as members of the City Council for the City of Boerne, Kendall County, Texas and others
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation v. Gary Agerton, et al
as 12-40085
Debtor:
In the Matter of: PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORP
Appellee:
GARY HEATH AGERTON, JACOB WILSON AGERTON, JERRY AGERTON and others
Appellant:
PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORP
USA v. Jason Morrison
as 11-50614
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JASON HEATH MORRISON
USA v. Jason Morrison
as 11-50613
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JASON HEATH MORRISON
Villas at The Promenade, LLC v. BP Company North America, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00363
Plaintiff:
Villas at The Promenade, LLC , Greg Boston , Pamela Demps and others
Defendant:
BP Company North America, Inc. , BP Corporation North America, Inc. , BP America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
Heath v. Enchanced Recovery Company LLC
as 3:2011cv00242
Plaintiff:
Chris Heath
Defendant:
Enchanced Recovery Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Chadwick Heath
as 11-10093
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHADWICK DARAY HEATH
USA v. Jeremy Ned
as 10-50546
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEREMY HEATH NED
Saffold v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
as 1:2007cv00598
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Antilles Lloyd Bermuda, Ltd. and Sunny Heath MV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
