Cases 1 - 10 of 21
HEATH v. PDP COMMISSIONER et al
as 2:2024cv01090
Plaintiff:
DARRELL M. HEATH
Defendant:
PDP COMMISSIONER, MEDICAL DIRECTOR and PAROLE CHAIRMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FINNIE v. PRIM CARE et al
as 5:2022cv03544
Plaintiff:
KEVIN G. FINNIE, SR.
Defendant:
PRIM CARE, SHAYNE GOODMAN RN and ADMIN HEATH SERVICES HEAD DR. CATTELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: HEATH
as 2:2022cv02688
Petitioner:
IN RE: ANTHONY HEATH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ZACHARY v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DAUPHIN COUNTY et al
as 2:2020cv05616
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DAUPHIN COUNTY
Petitioner:
HEATH ZACHARY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Heath v. Superintendent
as 5:2020cv03722
Petitioner:
Anthony Darrell Heath
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HEATH v. LINK et al
as 2:2017cv04221
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HEATH
Defendant:
CYNTHIA LINK, J. LOZAR and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURRELL v. GREEN et al
as 2:2017cv00439
Plaintiff:
JASON M. BURRELL
Defendant:
GREEN, DAVID BRYNE, JOHN SWIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEATH v. GILMORE
as 2:2015cv00880
Petitioner:
YARDEN HEATH
Respondent:
ROBERT GILMORE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARNEY v. ABERTS et al
as 5:2013cv07236
Plaintiff:
JERMEY HEATH BARNEY
Defendant:
WILLIAM ABERTS and JOHN MALDONADO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEATH v. FISHER
as 2:2013cv03802
Petitioner:
DARRELL HEATH
Respondent:
JON FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
