Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Jenkins v. Sebring et al
as 1:2018cv00311
Defendant:
Shaun Sebring, City of Gulfport, Mississippi, Brantley Cumberland and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDougle v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2017cv00264
Plaintiff:
Joseph McDougle
Defendant:
Hinds County, Mississippi, Robert Shuler Smith, Hinds County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Brennan et al
as 3:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
Brandy C Jenkins
Defendant:
Megan J. Brennan, Kirby Ragsdale and John Does I-V
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spann v. Management and Training Corp, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00065
Plaintiff:
Keith Spann
Defendant:
Management and Training Corp, Inc. , Lawrence Mack , Lepher Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2015cv00874
Plaintiff:
Chakakhan R. Davis
Defendant:
Hinds County, Mississippi , Tyrone Lewis , Jerry Arinder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
True the Vote et al v. Hosemann et al
as 3:2014cv00532
Plaintiff:
True the Vote , Jane Coln , Brandie Correro and others
Defendant:
Delbert Hosemann , The Republican Party of Mississippi , Copiah County, Mississippi Election Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jenkins v. Town of Vardaman, Mississippi et al
as 3:2010cv00075
Plaintiff:
Henry Thomas Jenkins
Defendant:
Town of Vardaman, Mississippi and Terral Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jenkins v. Rogers
as 3:2010cv00047
Plaintiff:
John Jenkins
Defendant:
William Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00043
Petitioner:
Beverly A. Clayton
Respondent:
The Geo Group, Inc., Jo Robbins, Carol Beverly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
