Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Rodrigues, et al. v. General Motors LLC
as 24-1945
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE RODRIGUES and CHARLES SMITH
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Rodrigues De Freitas v. The Hertz Corporation
as 24-1713
Plaintiff:
CARLOS ALBERTO RODRIGUES DE FREITAS, as Administrator of the Estate of Isabel Auler (deceased)
Defendant:
THE HERTZ CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
Gomes De Almeida, et al. v. Garland
as 24-731
Petitioner:
GILLIARD GOMES DE ALMEIDA, ADENISA RODRIGUES SABARA DOS SANTOS and MAIANY GIULLY RODRIGUES DE ALMEIDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hill v. Wise, et al.
as 24-605
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT J HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
TODD WISE, Unit Sgt., 2nd-shift, JON COERS, Classification Counselor 1, AARON KERSHAW, Unit Sgt., 3rd-shift and others
Rodriguez-Granados, et al. v. Garland
as 24-629
Petitioner:
REINA RODRIGUEZ-GRANADOS, FRANCISCO MATEO CORTEZ-RODRIGUES and KEYSEL ARIANNA CORTEZ-GRANADOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rodrigues Silva, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4371
Petitioner:
AMANDA RODRIGUES SILVA, RICARDO ALVES DE PAULA and SAMILLY VITORIA ALVES DA SILVA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Araujo Rodrigues Souza, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3970
Petitioner:
GELSMAR ARAUJO RODRIGUES SOUZA, SARA ALVES ARAUJO D'AVILA and LUCAS GABRIEL D'AVILA ARAUJO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pierre et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2023cv05981
Plaintiff:
Lamartine Pierre, Mark Whitlock, Lynn-Marie Rodrigues and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Rodrigues Fontes, et al. v. Garland
as 23-2826
Petitioner:
JUNIOR RODRIGUES FONTES, JULIANA VASCONCELOS BORGES, PABLO VASCONCELOS FONTES and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
