Cases 21 - 30 of 84
Rodrigues v. Family Justice Centers (Manhattan and Queens)
as 1:2018cv06999
Defendant:
Family Justice Center, Manhattan, Family Justice Center, Queens and Family Justice Centers (Manhattan and Queens)
Plaintiff:
Natalie Rodrigues
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delorean Motor Company v. Elysian Cosmetics, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv01421
Plaintiff:
Delorean Motor Company
Defendant:
Elysian Cosmetics, LLC , Michael Putman and David Rodrigues
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Rodrigues v. Salas et al
as 1:2017cv10258
Plaintiff:
Natalie Rodrigues
Defendant:
Alberto Salas, Larissa Hrabec, Sarah Kellner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodrigues v. NYC Health & Hygiene
as 1:2017cv10257
Plaintiff:
Natalie Rodrigues
Defendant:
NYC Health & Hygiene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Rodrigues v. Robles
as 1:2017cv10256
Plaintiff:
Natalie Rodrigues
Defendant:
Clemente Robles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07467
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv07467
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rodrigues v. American Security Insurance Company et al
as 1:2017cv00337
Defendant:
American Security Insurance Company , Green Tree Servicing LLC and Ditech Financial LLC
Plaintiff:
Elder Rodrigues
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Juarez et al v. SYS Chelsea Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02579
Defendant:
SYS Chelsea Inc., Th Plus Inc., 206 7th Ave Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Juarez, Douglas F. Pinto, Michele Placenti and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
