Cases 1 - 10 of 207
Xiquin Xirum, et al v. Garland
as 24-1413
Petitioner:
JACINTO XIQUIN XIRUM and BARTOLA ROMERO SANTOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Santos-Ramos v. Garland
as 24-1396
Petitioner:
JUNNIOR ALEXANDER SANTOS-RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Stroman v. Bristol County District Attorney's Office, et al
as 24-1038
Plaintiff:
EVANS EMONS STROMAN
Defendant:
BRISTOL COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, BRISTOL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, NEW BEDFORD DISTRICT COURT and others
Stroman v. Bristol County District Attorney's Office, et al
as 23-2061
Plaintiff:
EVANS EMONS STROMAN
Defendant:
BRISTOL COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, BRISTOL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, NEW BEDFORD DISTRICT COURT and others
Vieira Santos, et al v. Garland
as 23-2013
Petitioner:
MARYANGELA VIEIRA SANTOS and D.L.V.D.L.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Dos-Reis, et al v. Garland
as 23-1981
Petitioner:
DEVANI DOS-REIS, IVANETE FERREIRA DOS SANTOS-REIS, L.F.D.S.R. and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Santos-Camacho v. US
as 23-1917
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN BARTOLOME SANTOS-CAMACHO
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
LEWIS N. JACK
US v. Santos-Diaz
as 23-1899
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
CARLOS J. SANTOS-DIAZ, a/k/a Mambiche
Stroman v. Bristol County District Attorney's Office, et al
as 23-1806
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EVANS EMONS STROMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
BRISTOL COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, BRISTOL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, NEW BEDFORD DISTRICT COURT and others
Rice v. Resendes, et al
as 23-1433
Plaintiff:
BRIANNA J. ADAMS, BLENDA A. RICE and PATRICIA U. ADAMS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN M. RICE
Defendant / Appellee:
RYAN W. RESENDES, CHRISTOPHER M. PACHECO and SAMUEL RAMUS
Defendant:
MICHAEL W. MORRISSEY, EDWARD J. DOHERTY, MICHAEL KASPRZAK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
