Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Castro-Mota v. Bobby et al.
as 4:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Santos Castro-Mota
Defendant:
Warden David Bobby, Cousel Master, Counsel Haad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. City of Berea et al.
as 1:2023cv02032
Plaintiff:
James K Bryant and James Bryant
Defendant:
City of Berea, City of Berea Police Department, Daniel J Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2019cv00439
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith and Michael Davis
Plaintiff:
Mike Santos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Savoca v. O'Neill et al
as 1:2019cv00014
Defendant:
Josh Hank, Jack Remally, Gary Arbeswsek and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas James Savoca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. DesMarias et al
as 1:2015cv00442
Plaintiff:
Mike Santos
Defendant:
John DesMarias, Stuart Hudson, Andrew Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodward v. Coakley et al
as 4:2014cv01935
Plaintiff:
Ello M. Woodward
Defendant:
Joe Coakley, R. Hanson and Jose A. Santos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baez v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00856
Plaintiff:
Santos Baez
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections and Ohio State University Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santos v. United States of America
as 4:2012cv02746
Petitioner:
Ramon-Antonio Santos
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Marte v. Pugh et al
as 4:2012cv00922
Plaintiff:
Miguel Santos Marte
Defendant:
Michael Pugh, Correction Corporation of America and Northeast Ohio Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. Shartle
as 4:2010cv01087
Petitioner:
Ramon A. Santos
Respondent:
J. T. Shartle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
