Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Joya v. Harrison
as 3:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
Santos Elmer Hernandez Joya
Defendant:
Warden C. Harrison
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Estupinan-Paredes v. Warden C. Harrison Yazoo City Low I
as 3:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Santos Estupinan-Paredes
Defendant:
Warden C. Harrison Yazoo City Low 1 and C. Harrison
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jobe v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00039
Defendant:
Stephen Wheeler, Gloria Perry, Juan Santos and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Jobe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jones v. Turner et al
as 4:2019cv00136
Defendant:
Marshell Turner, Timothy Morris, Kelvin Steward and others
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Argo v. Brazier et al
as 3:2019cv00442
Plaintiff:
John Gilbert Argo, IV and Jay Argo
Defendant:
Plastic Surgeon, Nurse Practitioner Brown, Doctor William Brazier and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Hall et al
as 4:2018cv00018
Plaintiff:
Wendell Duncan
Defendant:
Pelisha Hall, Duan Santos, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruse v. Ms. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv00162
Plaintiff:
Andrew Clinton Cruse, Jr.
Defendant:
Ms. Dept. of Corrections, Pelicia Hall, Jerry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huskey v. Fisher et al
as 1:2017cv00140
Plaintiff:
Matthew Huskey
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Gloria Perry, Dennis Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De Los Santos v. Connors et al
as 5:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe De Los Santos
Defendant:
Stephen D. Julian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Evans v. Brown et al
as 4:2017cv00106
Plaintiff:
Timothy Nelson Evans
Defendant:
Angela Brown, Freddie Williams, Juan Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
