Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mutual Benefit Insurance Company v. Tomlin Homes, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01294
Plaintiff:
Mutual Benefit Insurance Company
Defendant:
Tomlin Homes, LLC, Ryan Dorsey and Crystal Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Davis v. Doory et al
as 1:2022cv00588
Petitioner:
Thomas Isiah Davis
Respondent:
Timothy J. Doory, Steven Crowley, Thomas Ports and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tomlin v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2019cv02655
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Denise Tomlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Baltimore City Police Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv01332
Defendant:
Detective Mark L. Tomlin, Detective Michael Crutchfield, Judge Kathleen Friedman and others
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Organizing for Action William A. Taccino v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2014cv02112
Plaintiff:
Organizing for Action William A. Taccino
Defendant:
United States of America, Various Departments and Agencies, President of the U.S.A. Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Archie v. Tomlin et al
as 8:2014cv00509
Plaintiff:
Nita B. Archie
Defendant:
Valaria Tomlin, Cynthia Edwards and Robert Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PHH Mortgage Corporation v. Tomlin et al
as 1:2013cv01355
Plaintiff:
PHH Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Parrish Tomlin and Melissa Tomlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Proctor et al v. Metropolitan Money Store Corp. et al
as 8:2007cv01957
Plaintiff:
Melvin J. Proctor, Jr., Melvin J. Proctor, Jr., Melvin J. Proctor, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Metropolitan Money Store Corp., Fordham and Fordham Investment Group, LTD., RTE Title & Escrow, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
