Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Whitehead v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv03334
Plaintiff:
Sherry Whitehead
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Torney v. Whitehead et al
as 8:2022cv03151
Plaintiff:
Shon Torney
Defendant:
Persis P. Whitehead, Irma Delborrio, Kevin Menzel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walkersville, Inc. v. Fate Therapeutics, et al.
as 8:2022cv02815
Respondent:
Fate Therapeutics, Inc. and Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research
Petitioner:
Lonza Walkersville, Inc.
Whitehead v. Dean et al
as 1:2022cv02643
Petitioner:
Renardo Whitehead
Respondent:
Robert Dean and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frink, et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
CAROL ANTHONY FRINK, DANNY L JORDAN, DEBRA J HOLCOMB and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Mahammend et al v. Galbraiph et al
as 1:2021cv03099
Plaintiff:
Khalid Austin Mahammend and Renardo Whitehead
Defendant:
Daniel Galbraiph, Sgt. Neal, Sgt. Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Whitehead v. Baltimore County Executive et al
as 1:2020cv02339
Plaintiff:
Renardo Whitehead
Defendant:
Aramark, Baltimore County Executive and Prime Care Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hammock v. Watts et al
as 8:2019cv03575
Defendant:
Renardo Whitehead, Malik Mungo, Director Gail Watts and others
Plaintiff:
Terrence Edward Hammock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Whitehead v. Matos et al
as 1:2014cv02737
Plaintiff:
Tevin Whitehead
Defendant:
Matos and Beadle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitehead v. Matos et al
as 1:2014cv02570
Plaintiff:
Tevin Whitehead
Defendant:
Matos, Central Kitchen, Maryland Correction Training Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
