Cases 1 - 10 of 156
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024oe01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Johanan v. Cuyahoga County Juvenile Court et al.
as 1:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Jessica Johanan
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Juvenile Court, Alison L. Floyd, Danielle Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Barrick v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 2:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Alison Barrick
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Erbetta v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Alison Erbetta
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Blash Bey v. Cole et al.
as 5:2023cv01953
Plaintiff:
Derrick Blash Bey
Defendant:
Aaron M. Cole, Alison Breaux and Sheriff Kandy Fatheree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Marly Guitron Roche De De Leon, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3739
Petitioner:
MARLY YOLANDA GUITRON ROCHE DE DE LEON, DILEAN TAMARA DE LEON GUITRON and ALISON PAMELA DE LEON GUITRON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
