Cases 11 - 20 of 51
BLAIR-SCOTT v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv02258
Defendant:
LAUREN GRIFFIN, VIJAY SHARMA and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
SCHEKERA BLAIR-SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
SANCHEZ v. MILLIE'S SPRING VALLEY, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00181
Plaintiff:
ELMER SANCHEZ
Defendant:
ROBERT BLAIR, DAVID M. SCRIBNER and MILLIE'S SPRING VALLEY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RABER et al v. BLACK HAWK CONTRACTING LLC
as 1:2019cv03179
Plaintiff:
Stephen Raber, BLAIR RABER, BLAIR M. RABER and others
Defendant:
BLACK HAWK CONTRACTING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2019cv03004
Plaintiff:
CAROL DANKS, KEVIN A CLAFTON, COLT BOWIE CAUMUNE and others
Defendant:
MOHAMMD JAVAD ZARIF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ARNOLD, et al v. SECRETARY OF THE NAVY et al
as 1:2019cv02755
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DUFOUR, ANDREW CALHOUN, TIMOTHY DEMY and others
Defendant:
NAVY CHIEF OF CHAPLAINS, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY and CHIEF OF NAVAL PERSONNEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BLAIR v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv02470
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
BEATE JOANNA BLAIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLAIR v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv01434
Plaintiff:
FRANCES BLAIR
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01271
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. v. BLAIR et al
as 1:2019cv00975
Defendant:
RODERICK BLAIR, JAMES CLARK and PAUL MAUCHA
Plaintiff:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
