Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00930
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Asher et al v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00238
Plaintiff:
Cory Feltner, Anna Standafer, Alex Powell and others
Defendant:
Andrews Dairy Store Inc, Lear Corporation Eeds and Interiors, LLC, CP Product LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. REVMOUNTAIN, LLC et al
as 1:2017mc00055
Defendant:
ABSOLUTELY WORKING, LLC, ACTION PRO WHITE, LLC, ANASAZI MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Krausz Industries Ltd v. Smith-Blair Inc et al
as 1:2017mc00015
Plaintiff:
Krausz Industries Ltd
Defendant:
Smith-Blair Inc , Sensus USA Inc and Sensus Manufacturing Shanghai Limited
Miscellaneous_party:
Ford Meter Box
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WILLIAMSON et al v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
as 1:2003cv01456
Plaintiff:
AFEWERKI ABEBE, ODEY AGI, MALCOLM BELFROM, JR. and others
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS-DISTRICT LODGE 141-M and UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
Claimant:
MICHAEL M OLSON
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
