Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Cantwell-Taylor v. Cantwell et al
as 1:2023cv16049
Defendant:
Peter Cantwell and Frank E. Cantwell, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Chloe Cantwell-Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Cantwell et al v. Lloyd's of London et al
as 2:2020cv02371
Plaintiff:
Juanita Wright, Juan Enterprises LLC and John Cantwell
Defendant:
American Bankers Insurance Company and Lloyd's of London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Calvin B. Cantwell v. Sentry Select Insurance Company
as 5:2018cv00193
Plaintiff:
Calvin B. Cantwell
Defendant:
Sentry Select Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
GlobalTap LLC v. Cantwell & Cantwell
as 1:2016cv04395
Plaintiff:
GlobalTap LLC
Defendant:
Cantwell & Cantwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Global Tap, LLC v. Cantwell & Cantwell
as 1:2015cv09590
Plaintiff:
Global Tap, LLC
Defendant:
Cantwell & Cantwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Cantwell Family Trust (1998) et al v. Hyten et al
as 1:2015cv00414
Plaintiff:
Cantwell Family Trust (1998) and Cantwell Holdings, Ltd.
Defendant:
Scott J. Hyten and Sherwyn Hyten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Curtis Moore, et al v. EPS Settlements Group, et al
as 15-10173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS MOORE and JOSEPH MOORE, Warden
Defendant - Appellee:
EPS SETTLEMENTS GROUP, JOHN CANTWELL and DOES 1-100
MOORE et al v. EPS SETTLEMENTS GROUP et al
as 9:2014cv80521
Plaintiff:
CURTIS MOORE and JOSEPH MOORE
Defendant:
EPS SETTLEMENTS GROUP , JOHN CANTWELL and DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
