Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Coffey v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00568
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Sara Dawn Coffey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. 84.53 acres of land, more or less, in Calhoun, Marshall, Ritchie, Tyler and Wetzel Counties West Virginia et al
as 1:2018cv00009
Defendant:
Stephen M. Fye and Nancy F. Fye, Daisy Beardshaw, Janice F. Brookover and others
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Coffey et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv09101
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Coffey and David Coffey
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coffey v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv06390
Plaintiff:
Janet Coffey
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coffey-Hard v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05535
Plaintiff:
Tammy Coffey-Hard
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coffey et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02248
Plaintiff:
Karen Coffey and Robert Coffey
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coffey v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13010
Plaintiff:
Deborah Coffey
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coffey v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09468
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Sherry Coffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jarvis v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv07596
Plaintiff:
Carol Coffey Jarvis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , C. R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coffey v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05489
Plaintiff:
Paula Coffey
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
