Cases 1 - 10 of 1,522
Jones v. Hooker et al
as 3:2024cv03121
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Jones
Defendant:
. Hooker, 4th Dist Appt Ct Clerk (J Doe) or rep and Cynthia A Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramon Alvarado, Jr. v. Matthew Burns, et al
as 24-1834
Plaintiff:
RAMON ALVARADO, JR.
Defendant:
MATTHEW BURNS, CYNTHIA RADTKE, Captain, JEREMY WESTRA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jones v. Hooker et al
as 1:2024cv03862
Plaintiff:
Gregoy D Jones
Defendant:
Judge Hooker, 4th Distr Cppt-Cpt- Clerk (J Doe) or rep. and Cynthia A Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Few v. San Jose Police Dept. et al
as 1:2024cv03832
Plaintiff:
Jenessia Few
Defendant:
San Jose Police Dept., Cynthia Beltran-Hahn, Trent Tessler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Bernard Murray v. Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03605
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Marie Bernard Murray
Defendant:
Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Haffey, Cynthia v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Haffey
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A. - Employee Benefits
Mathews v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03309
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Mathews
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., LOREAL USA Products, Inc., Soft Sheen-Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Abbott v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03108
Plaintiff:
Cynthia M Abbott
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
