Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Houck v. Low Country Health Care System Inc
as 1:2019cv02038
Plaintiff:
Donna Houck
Defendant:
Low Country Health Care System Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Houck v. Jones et al
as 1:2014cv04156
Plaintiff:
Donna Houck
Defendant:
Robert Jones and Low Country Health Care System Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Houck v. Jones et al
as 1:2014cv04157
Plaintiff:
Donna Houck
Defendant:
Robert Jones and Low Country Health Care System Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Houck v. Jones et al
as 1:2014cv04153
Plaintiff:
Donna Houck
Defendant:
Robert Jones and Low Country Health Care System Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Houck v. Jones et al
as 1:2014cv04154
Plaintiff:
Donna Houck
Defendant:
Robert Jones and Low Country Health Care System Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
John Frilando v. United States of America et al
as 4:2013cv00861
Plaintiff:
John Frilando
Defendant:
United States of America, Weston Houck, Cameron Currie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Singleton v. 10 Unidentified US Marshals et al
as 8:2011cv01811
Plaintiff:
Michael A Singleton
Defendant:
10 Unidentified US Marshals, SC, State of, NJ, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. 10 Unidentified US Marshals et al
as 2:2011cv01811
Plaintiff:
Michael A Singleton
Defendant:
10 Unidentified US Marshals, SC, State of, NJ, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. United States, The et al
as 8:2011cv01198
Plaintiff:
Michael A Singleton
Defendant:
United States, The, NJ Federal District, SC Federal District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. United States, The et al
as 2:2011cv01198
Plaintiff:
Michael A Singleton
Defendant:
United States, The, NJ Federal District, SC Federal District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
