Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Hughes (ID 105577) v. McClain
as 5:2024cv03054
Plaintiff:
Dashawn M. Hughes
Defendant:
Christopher McClain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes (ID 105577) v. Easley et al
as 5:2022cv03315
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Hughes and Dashawn Hughes
Defendant:
Tim Easley, Paul Cory, Joel East and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes (ID 105577) v. Graham et al
as 5:2022cv03309
Plaintiff:
Da'Shawn M. Hughes and Dashawn M. Hughes
Defendant:
Jim Graham, Paul Cary, Miranda Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parris v. RiverSource Life Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv02521
Plaintiff:
Hugh-Gordon Parris
Defendant:
Riversource Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Flemming et al v. Dayoub, et al
as 5:2022cv03066
Plaintiff:
Antonio B. Flemming, James Michael Poterbin, Kurt Kingsley and others
Defendant:
Charles A. Dayoub, United States Marshal Service, (fnu) Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Newton et al v. Hudson et al
as 5:2022cv03011
Plaintiff:
Andre Newton, Miguel Pizarro, Brian Pizarro and others
Defendant:
D. Hudson, Ol Aulepp, (fnu) Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hughes (ID 105577) v. Cory et al
as 5:2021cv03281
Defendant:
Paul Cory, Cory Paul and Bobby Gray
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes (ID 96576) v. Schnurr et al
as 5:2021cv03222
Plaintiff:
Charley James Hughes, Jr.
Defendant:
Dan Schnurr and Patti Keen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes (ID 96576) v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2021cv03036
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Petitioner:
Charley James Hughes, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hughes (ID 96576) v. Keen et al
as 5:2021cv03033
Plaintiff:
Charley James Hughes, Jr.
Defendant:
Douglas W. Burris, Patti Keen and Rachel Wedel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
