Cases 1 - 10 of 31
LANE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00026
Petitioner:
THOMAS LANE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Burger v. US
as 24-1249
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BASIL AGAPION, SOPHIA S. AGAPION, KATHE BURGER and others
Plaintiff:
GUILFORD BUILDERS SUPPLY CO.
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Chapman Spring/Garden, LLC v. US
as 24-1250
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHAPMAN SPRING/GARDEN, LLC, CHANEY-FRYE #4, LLC, D.S. CHANEY PROPERTIES #6, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
LANE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01988
Petitioner:
CHRISTINA LANE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
LANE-LEE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01783
Petitioner:
RAVEN LANE-LEE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
US v. Croft
as 23-1200
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
BRADLEY LANE CROFT
ASI, Inc. v. Fingerhut Direct Marketing
as 19-1834
Defendant:
MANLEY TOYS, LTD., a Hong Kong, China corporation, dba Manley Toys, dba ToyQuest, MENARD, INC., a Wisconsin corporation, FINGERHUT DIRECT MARKETING, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASI, INC., a Minnesota corporation, fka Aviva Sports, Inc.
Respondent / Appellee:
AQUAWOOD LLC, BRIAN DUBINSKY, PARK LANE SOLUTIONS LTD. and others
Oracle America, Inc. v. Google LLC
as 17-1118
Amicus Curiae:
STEVE WOZNIAK, AMERICAN PHOTOGRAPHIC ARTISTS, JOSEPH SCOTT MILLER and others
Defendant / Cross Appellant:
GOOGLE LLC and GOOGLE INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
AIRPORT ROAD ASSOCIATES, LTD. et al v. USA
as 1:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
AIRPORT ROAD ASSOCIATES, LTD. , BAYOU DES GLAISES, LTD. , BLOOMFIELD PARTNERSHIP II and others
Defendant:
USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
