Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Cody Lane Development Corp v. Layton Construction Company LLC
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Cody Lane Development Corp
Defendant:
Layton Construction Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plimpton v. Bank of Jackson Hole et al
as 0:2021cv00050
Defendant:
John Smiley, Holland & Hart, LLP, Ballard Spahr LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Plimpton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00235
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00209
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00204
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00205
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Friedman v. Bank of Jackson Hole et al
as 2:2020cv00161
Defendant:
Colleen Lane, Charles Hingle, Bank of Jackson Hole and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Friedman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Federal Trade Commission v. RevMountain LLC et al
as 2:2017mc00098
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
RevMountain LLC, RoadRunner B2C LLC, Wave Rock LLC and others
United States of America v. 2141 Thorndike Avenue, Casper, Wyoming et al
as 1:2016cv00283
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2141 Thorndike Avenue, Natrona County, Casper, Wyoming and 2001 East Primavera Lane, Mohave County, Fort Mohave, Arizona
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983
Lane v. Buckley et al
as 2:2015cv00155
Plaintiff:
Robert M Lane
Defendant:
Lucas E Buckley , DFWU LLC, Dray, Dyekman Reed and Healey PC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
