Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Ferguson Sr. v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv02097
Plaintiff:
King B.M. Ferguson Sr. and Blaane A. Oteo
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Charles Mims, Richard Timothy Hamil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Cobble et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
David Cobble and American Citizens
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Brad Raffensperger, Alexander Soros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Appeal, Inc. v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv01079
Plaintiff:
The Appeal, Inc.
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Shawn Emmons, Georgia Attorney Gen Christopher M. Carr and others
v. OLIVER
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J OLIVER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Giles v. Jacobs et al
as 1:2023cv05165
Plaintiff:
Oliver Giles
Defendant:
Nick Jacobs, Ryan Kenley and Court Whitten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Oliver v. Pal
as 4:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Anthony Oliver
Defendant:
Michael Mahendra Pal doing business as Hook Recovery and Towing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodman et al v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv03057
Plaintiff:
Valancia Goodman and Gregory Maloy
Defendant:
Sheriff/Chief Deputy Levon Allen, Chief Deputy / Sheri Roland Boehrer, Jail Adminisrator Terrance Gibson and others
4Th Party Defendant:
Jail Officer F. Radford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
