Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Dill et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Teresa Denise Dill, Tarrah Layne Woods, Shannon Michelle Longman and others
Defendant:
FNU Thomas, FNU Hansen, FNU Shumack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Bowen et al
as 5:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
Salvador Perez, Jr
Defendant:
Mark Bowen, FNU Caldwell, FNU Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Miguel Octavio Gonzalez Perez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Perez v. Bowen et al
as 5:2022cv00678
Plaintiff:
Salvador Perez, Jr
Defendant:
Mark Bowen, Mr. Caldwell, Mr. Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaines v. Brown et al
as 5:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jordan Gaines and Omar Talib Shakur
Defendant:
Kevin Brown, Julia Doorman, Jerome Fergerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Perez v. Bowen et al
as 5:2021cv00506
Defendant:
FNU Rhodes, FNU Bowen, FNU Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Salvador Perez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Morales et al
as 5:2021cv00228
Defendant:
P Stuckey, Robert Morales, Comanche County Courthouse and others
Plaintiff:
Salvador Perez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Mohamed et al
as 5:2021cv00080
Defendant:
Ahmed Mohamed, US Xpress Leasing Inc, U.S. Xpress, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Autumn Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01233
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
