Cases 31 - 40 of 115
Wales v. Parker et al
as 3:2018cv00403
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Wales
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Yolanda Pittman, Justine Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce et al v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. et al
as 3:2018mc00003
Plaintiff:
Jesse Pierce and Michael Pierce
Defendant:
Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. and Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc.
Patterson v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2017cv01409
Plaintiff:
Rodney T. Patterson
Defendant:
Core Civic, Damon Hinniger, Blair Liebach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Correct Care et al
as 3:2017cv01322
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Pierce
Defendant:
Correct Care, (f/n/u) Bridges, Core Civic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Maury County et al
as 1:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
Harold M. Smith and Keith Pierce
Defendant:
Maury County and Maury County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv00125
Petitioner:
Kimberly Lynn Pierce
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of and SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Pierce, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv01101
Plaintiff:
William Wyatt Pierce, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Western Excelsior Corporation v. Propex Operating Company, LLC et al (PLR1)
as 1:2016cv00506
Plaintiff:
Western Excelsior Corporation
Defendant:
Propex Operating Company, LLC and R. Lee Pierce
Counter_claimant:
R. Lee Pierce
Counter_defendant:
Western Excelsior Corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Lankford v. Tennessee Department of Correction
as 3:2016cv03289
Plaintiff:
John Pierce Lankford
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Schofield et al
as 3:2016cv00673
Plaintiff:
James T Pierce
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Kevin Hampton and Todd Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
