Cases 1 - 10 of 161
Pierce v. Schwebel Baking Company et al.
as 4:2024cv00612
Plaintiff:
Marcus Pierce
Defendant:
Schwebel Baking Company and Local 377 Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen & Helpers Union
Pierce v. Robinson
as 4:2024cv00570
Petitioner:
James Eugene Pierce
Respondent:
Warden Norm Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce et al v. Premier Health Partners
as 3:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Gloria Pierce, Christine Hughes and Michael Finley
Defendant:
Premier Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Pierce v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01122
Plaintiff:
Teddi L. Pierce
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Pierce v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01732
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Pierce
Defendant:
DAVOL,INC./C.R. BARD, INC. and Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pierce County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2018op45195
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Pierce County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jensen v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01250
Plaintiff:
Pierce Jensen
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Pierce v. Wash Wag, LLC
as 1:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Holly Pierce
Defendant:
Wash Wag, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pierce v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Pierce
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pierce v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
BRIAN P. PIERCE
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
