Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2014cv03098
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2013cv03204
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Engle v. Pierce et al
as 2:2013cv02589
Plaintiff:
Catrina Engle
Defendant:
Michelle M. Pierce , Mission, Kansas, City of , Timothy D. Gift and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pierce v. Waddington et al
as 5:2013cv03160
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2013cv01335
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Douglas Pierce
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Healix Infusion Therapy, Inc. v. Sahgal
as 2:2013mc00226
Plaintiff:
Healix Infusion Therapy, Inc.
Defendant:
Vivek Sahgal, M.D., P.A.
Garnishee:
Missouri Bank & Trust Co. of Kansas City, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc., Aetna Health, Inc. and others
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2013cv03108
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company v. Weibert et al
as 6:2011cv01302
Plaintiff:
Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company
Defendant:
Shirley Weibert, David M. Weibert, Kimberly R. Mohan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
