Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 298
Rico v. Ducart, et al.
as 24-3038
Plaintiff: JORGE ANDRADE RICO
Defendant: CLARK E. DUCART, JIM ROBERTSON, D BRADBURY and others
Bahrambeygui v. Robertson, et al.
as 24-2944
Petitioner: ALI HASSEM BAHRAMBEYGUI
Respondent: JAMES ROBERTSON and ROB BONTA
Amersi v. Sheridan et al
as 3:2024cv00726
Plaintiff: Amin Amersi
Defendant: John F Sheridan, Leigh A Vosseller, Brian B Hansen and others
Drew v. Smith, et al.
as 24-68
Petitioner / Appellant: KARL D. DREW
Respondent / Appellee: STEPHEN SMITH
Respondent: JAMES ROBERTSON
Daro v. Embark Technology, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv03246
Plaintiff: Andy Daro
Defendant: Embark Technology, Inc., Elaine Chao, Patricia Chiodo and others
Tarlecky v. Embark Technology, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03211
Plaintiff: Karen Tarlecky
Defendant: Embark Technology, Inc., Elaine Chao, Patricia Chiodo and others
Gerow v. United States Department of Justice et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01059
Plaintiff: Eric Gerow
Defendant: United States Department of Justice, Phoenix, City of, Phoenix Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Injunction
Suarez v. Robertson
as 22-2097
Petitioner: JOSE ALFREDO SUAREZ
Respondent: STEPHEN SMITH, ACTING WARDEN and JAMES ROBERTSON, WARDEN
Arizona Attorneys for Criminal Justice, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 22-16729
Plaintiff / Appellee: ARIZONA ATTORNEYS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CHRISTOPHER BAIRD DUPONT, RICH ROBERTSON and others
Defendant / Appellant: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Arizona;
Defendant: MARET VESSELLA, Chief Bar Counsel of the State Bar of Arizona; and COLONEL HESTON SILBERT, Colonel, in his official capacity as Director of the Arizona Department of Public Safety.
Karl Drew v. Jim Robertson
as 22-70187
Petitioner: KARL D. DREW
Respondent: JIM ROBERTSON, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?