Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Oaster v. Robertson
as 1:2015cv00871
Plaintiff:
Bradley D. Oaster
Defendant:
Stanley Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Robertson v. USA
as 1:2014cv01938
Petitioner:
James P. Robertson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Robertson v. Metro Wastewater Reclamation District
as 1:2013cv02926
Plaintiff:
April Robertson
Defendant:
Metro Wastewater Reclamation District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01470
In_re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Hinojos-Lopez et al v. Shurr, et al
as 1:2013cv00364
Plaintiff:
Eliu Rey Hinojos-Lopez , Ezequiel Hinojos-Lopez , Ernistina Hinojos Lopez-Ordonez and others
Defendant:
Matthew Schurr, Seth Robertson and City of Aurora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hinojos-Lopez et al v. Aurora Police Officer Matthew Schurr et al
as 1:2013cv00362
Plaintiff:
Eliu Rey Hinojos-Lopez, Ezequiel Hinojos-Lopez, Ernistina Hinojos Lopez-Ordonez and others
Defendant:
Aurora Police Officer Matthew Schurr, Aurora Police Officer Seth Robertson and City of Aurora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robertson v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv03217
Plaintiff:
Michael S Robertson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
