Cases 31 - 40 of 47
ROBERTSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv01415
Plaintiff:
CHARLETA ROBERTSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DIXON v. ROBERTSON
as 1:2010cv00676
Plaintiff:
ERNEST L. DIXON
Defendant:
JAMES ROBERTSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEUER v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 1:2010cv00358
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN JOSEPH HEUER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO, JEFFREY DAVID NEDROW and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ROBERTSON v. CARTINHOUR
as 1:2009cv01642
Plaintiff:
WADE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. CARTINHOUR, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
MOORE, et al v. CHERTOFF
as 1:2000cv00953
Plaintiff:
REGINALD G. MOORE , JOHN E. TURNER , C. YVETTE SUMMEROUR and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
ROBERTSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv01188
Plaintiff:
TRACIE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and CATHY LANIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ROBERTSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
as 1:2009cv00860
Plaintiff:
JERRY E. ROBERTSON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2008cv01565
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH THOMPSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, SAMUEL ROBERTSON, JEFFREY S. KOSTBAR and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
WORKMAN v. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2008cv01566
Plaintiff:
COLLEEN ROBERTSON WORKMAN
Defendant:
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT and DC BUSINESSMEN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
