Cases 41 - 50 of 518
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wolfford v. Hendrick Medical Center et al
as 1:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Wolfford
Defendant:
Hendrick Medical Center, Robertson Unit, James Trammell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Deerbrook Mall, LLC
as 4:2023cv01657
Plaintiff:
Elaine V. Robertson
Defendant:
Deerbrook Mall, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Robertson v. Lumpkin
as 3:2023cv00107
Petitioner:
Bruce Owen Robertson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heath v. French Robertson Unit
as 1:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
French Robertson Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Escambia Asset Co., LLC, et al. v. Callaway, et al.
as 4:2023cv01234
Plaintiff:
ESCAMBIA ASSET CO., LLC and ESCAMBIA OPERATING CO., LLC
Defendant:
CHARLES CALLAWAY, d.b.a. Damsco, WASHOE COMPANY, GRAND RIVER RESOURCES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Heath v. French Robertson Unit
as 4:2023cv01159
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
French Robertson Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Dallas County
as 4:2023cv00239
Petitioner:
Steven Ray Robertson
Respondent:
Dallas County, Collin County and TDCJ Parole Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. Allstate Texas Lloyd's
as 4:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
DONALD ROBERTSON
Defendant:
ALLSTATE TEXAS LLOYD'S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
