Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Robertson v. Bishop et al
as 8:2015cv03371
Petitioner:
Wayne Anthony Robertson
Respondent:
Frank Bishop and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robertson v. Nationstar Mortgage Holdings Inc et al
as 8:2015cv03206
Plaintiff:
Kevin T. Robertson
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage Holdings Inc and BWW Law Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00353
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kuzner et al v. One West Bank Joesph Otting et al
as 8:2014cv02699
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Kuzner, Jr., Robert A. Kuzner, Sr. and Geraldine C. Kuzner
Defendant:
One West Bank Joesph Otting, One West Bank Steven Mnucichi, McCable, Weisberg & Conway, LLC Terrance McCabe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stonebridge Life Insurance Company v. Robertson et al
as 1:2014cv02199
Plaintiff:
Stonebridge Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Lavera E. Robertson, Cynthia Camelia Willis, Roslyn Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Botero et al v. Valogic, LLC et al
as 8:2014cv00544
Plaintiff:
Jaime Botero and Carlos Alberto Botero
Defendant:
Valogic, LLC and William C Robertson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Robertson v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv00197
Plaintiff:
Tonia Robertson
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02553
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Robertson v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv01905
Plaintiff:
Douglas J. Robertson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Robertson v. United States
as 1:2013cv01383
Plaintiff:
Kevin Robertson
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
