Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Sellers v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01741
Plaintiff:
John Sellers
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sellers v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03870
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
PAULA J. SELLERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sellers v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01013
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Becton Dickinson Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Delana G Sellers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sellers v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02234
Plaintiff:
Edwin L. Sellers
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Derden v. City of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2017cv00336
Plaintiff:
Inez Derden
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati , Det. Nedra Ward , P.O. Linda Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Columbus Sheet Metal Workers Apprenticeship et al v. Komer
as 2:2017cv00069
Petitioner:
Columbus Sheet Metal Workers Apprenticeship , International Training Institute for the Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Industry , Joseph Sellers and others
Respondent:
Kyle A Komer
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Sellers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2015cv02928
Plaintiff:
Emily R. Sellers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Sellers v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01805
Plaintiff:
Pamela Kay Sellers
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sellers v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01046
Plaintiff:
Sharon A. Sellers
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnold Sellers v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv00658
Plaintiff:
Julie Ann Arnold Sellers
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
