Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Petero v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv05715
Plaintiff:
Tanner A Petero
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Raisor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv05389
Plaintiff:
Tanner K Raisor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ariel Tanner v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 8:2021cv00194
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Ms. Ariel Tanner and Ariel Tanner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Song v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv01110
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Tanner A. Song
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Todd Eric Tanner v. Carolyn W Colvin
as 5:2014cv01689
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Todd Eric Tanner
Tanner v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv00435
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Lamont L. Tanner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Ellis Ranee Reed et al v. Michael J. Astrue
as 8:2013cv00018
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Ellis Ranee Reed and Giesela Tanner
Douglas Tanner v. Michael J Astrue
as 8:2008cv00338
Plaintiff:
Douglas Tanner
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Tanner v. Astrue
as 2:2007cv01320
Plaintiff:
Charlotte L Tanner
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tanner v. Astrue
as 2:2007cv00129
Plaintiff:
Timothy N Tanner
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
