Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Button et al v. Hickle et al
as 1:2024cv00220
Defendant:
Katherine Thonis, Patrick Hickle, Elizabeth Hickle and others
Plaintiff:
Dusty Button and Mitchell Taylor Button
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
USA v. $13,794.00 US Currency
as 1:2024cv00193
Claimant:
Joseph Taylor
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$13,794.00 US Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Taylor v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00150
Petitioner:
Dione Taylor
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Taylor v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00913
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Taylor
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00935
Plaintiff:
Paul Taylor
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation, Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC. and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gagnon v. Gagnon et al
as 1:2021cv00800
Plaintiff:
Jean M. Gagnon
Defendant:
Constance Gagnon, Kathleen Sands, Theresa Pare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00493
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Taylor v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00350
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jessica Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2021fp00083
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Petitioner:
Dave A. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taylor v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00021
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Tarkesha Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
