Cases 1 - 10 of 635
Riveros v. Robles et al
as 7:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Carol Juliana Riveros
Defendant:
Jonathan Humberto Robles, Ayala's Transport, Inc., Wade Hampton Wiles, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Briggs v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00327
Petitioner:
Charles Wade Briggs
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Briggs v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00330
Petitioner:
Charles Wade Briggs
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Poston v. USA
as 1:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Lucas Wade Poston
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wade v. Zavala et al
as 3:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Jerome Wade
Defendant:
Luis Edgar Aguero Zavala and Wesco Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Prince et al v. Jaworowski et al
as 4:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Wayman L Prince and JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A
Defendant:
Jeffrey Jaworowski, Marlon Willliams, Wade Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv01114
Petitioner:
Aaron Wade Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04444
Petitioner:
Aaron Wade Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brandon Wade Photography LLC v. Killian Design LLC
as 3:2023cv02286
Plaintiff:
Brandon Wade Photography, LLC and Brandon Wade Photography LLC
Defendant:
Killian Design, LLC and Killian Design LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
