Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Palafox v. Warden Green et al
as 9:2023cv00082
Petitioner:
Domingo Jose Palafox
Respondent:
Warden Green and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beltran v. Warden Jaquez
as 4:2023cv00040
Petitioner:
Anthony Joseph Beltran
Respondent:
Warden Jaquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Faircloth v. Salmonsen et al
as 2:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Faircloth
Defendant:
Jim Salmonsen, C/O Teegan, Dr. Jauch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Corecivic Prison et al
as 4:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Jacob Smith
Defendant:
Corecivic Prison, Warden, Mr. Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nickerson v. Gootkin et al
as 6:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Shane Phillip Nickerson
Defendant:
Brian Gootkin, Jim Salmonsen and Associate Warden Godfrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dagel v. Warden Visser et al
as 4:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Ryan Joseph Dagel
Defendant:
Warden Visser, Sheriff Slaughter, Undersheriff Reeves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matta v. Shf. Slaughter et al
as 4:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Ras Jahmikes Matta
Defendant:
Shf. Slaughter, Ofc. Albright, Ofc. Blanco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beeson v. Elliott et al
as 9:2021cv00143
Plaintiff:
Taylor Anthony Beeson
Defendant:
Tara J. Elliott, Troy Capser, Brandon Cray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bristol v. Warden Godfrey et al
as 6:2021cv00087
Petitioner:
Gary Bristol
Respondent:
Warden Godfrey and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gomez v Shelby Prison CCC et al.
as 4:2021cv00099
Plaintiff:
Mario Gomez
Defendant:
Shelby Prison CCC, Chief of Unit Management Hatton, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
