Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Care One, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board
as 23-7475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARE ONE, LLC, HEALTHBRIDGE MANAGEMENT, LLC, CARE REALTY, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, an agency of the United States, LAUREN MCFERRAN, in their capacities as Members of the National Labor Relations Board, GWYNNE WILCOX, in their capacities as Members of the National Labor Relations Board and others
Care One, LLC et al v. National Labor Relations Board et al
as 3:2023cv00831
Plaintiff:
Care One, LLC, Healthbridge Management, LLC, Care Realty, LLC and others
Defendant:
National Labor Relations Board, Lauren McFerran, Gwynne Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
CARE ONE, LLC et al v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD et al
as 2:2023cv03221
Plaintiff:
CARE ONE, LLC, HEALTHBRIDGE MANAGEMENT, LLC, CARE REALTY, LLC and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, LAUREN MCFERRAN, GWYNNE WILCOX and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. PNC BANK NA et al
as 2:2021cv19436
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Material Witne:
PNC BANK N.A., HEALTHBRIDGE MANAGEMENT LLC, 107 OSBORNE STREET OPERATING COMPANY II, LLC doing business as Danbury HCC and others
Intervenor:
CARE ONE LLC, ABC1857, LLC, Care Ventures, LLC and others
National Labor Relations Board v. PNC Bank NA
as 3:2021mc00015
Petitioner:
NLRB National Labor Relations Board
Not Classified By Court:
PNC Bank NA, 1 Burr Road Operating Company II, LLC doing business as Westport Healthcare Center, 107 Osborne Street Operating Company II, LLC doing business as Danbury HCC and others
Intervenor:
Care One, LLC, THCI Mortgage Holding Company, LLC, THCI Holding Company, LLC and others
National Labor Relations Board v. Healthbridge Management, LLC
as 17-1149
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Healthbridge Management, LLC, 107 Osborne Street Operating Company II, LLC, DBA Danbury Health Care Center, 710 Long Ridge Road Operating Company II, LLC, DBA Long Ridge of Stamford and others
Healthbridge Management, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board
as 17-934
Petitioner-Cross-Respondent:
Healthbridge Management, LLC, 107 Osborne Street Operating Company II, LLC, DBA Danbury Health Care Center, 710 Long Ridge Road Operating Company II, LLC, DBA Long Ridge of Stamford and others
Respondent-Cross-Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Kreisberg v. Healthbridge Management, LLC
as 14-2174
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jonathan B. Kreisberg, Regional Director of Region 34 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
710 Long Ridge Rd Operating Co II, LLC, DBA Long Ridge of Stamford, 240 Church Street Operating Company II, LLC, DBA Newington Health Care Center, 1 Burr Rd Operating Co II, LLC, DBA Westport Health Care Center and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Healthbridge Management, LLC, DBA Danbury HCC
Kreisberg v. Healthbridge Management, LLC
as 13-4850
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jonathan B. Kreisberg, Regional Director of Region 34 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
710 Long Ridge Rd Operating Co II, LLC, DBA Long Ridge of Stamford, 240 Church Street Operating Company II, LLC, DBA Newington Health Care Center, 1 Burr Rd Operating Co II, LLC, DBA Westport Health Care Center and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Healthbridge Management, LLC, FKA Danbury HCC
Kreisberg v. Healthbridge Management, LLC
as 12-4890
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jonathan B. Kreisberg, Regional Director of Region 34 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Defendant - Appellant:
Healthbridge Management, LLC, DBA Danbury HCC, 710 Long Ridge Rd Operating Co II, LLC, DBA Long Ridge of Stamford, 240 Church Street Operating Company II, LLC, DBA Newington Health Care Center and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
