Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Bloomfield et al v. 3M Company
as 3:2023cv01818
Plaintiff:
Greg Bloomfield, Crystal Moore and Richard Uslander
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453 Class Action Fairness Act
State of Wisconsin v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
State of Wisconsin
Defendant:
3M Company, E.I. Dupont de Nemours and Company, DuPont de Nemours Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 tc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 wt Removal- Employment (Wrongful Termination)
County of San Diego v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2022cv01671
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Inc., Raytheon Technologies Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
County of San Diego
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
The People of the State of California et al v. 3M Co. et al
as 3:2022cv01013
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of California and The City of San Diego
Defendant:
3M Co., Buckeye Fire Equipment Co., Carrier Global Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pl Removal- Product Liability
Bingham v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2020cv02362
Defendant:
3M Company, Dynax Corporation, National Foam, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Randal Bingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pl
Myslak v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2020cv02361
Defendant:
3M Company, Dynax Corporation, E.I. DuPont and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Myslak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pl
ZAMUDIO v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2020cv00070
Defendant:
3M Company
Plaintiff:
Clayton L. Zamudio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Zamudio v. 3M Company Inc.
as 3:2019cv02277
Defendant:
3M Company Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clayton L. Zamudio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arrieta et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2019cv02087
Plaintiff:
Miquel Arturo Bonillas, Nixon Mercado, Miquel Angel Aguayo and others
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 and 3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
